HL vs. FIGS
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) are both stocks. HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, HL returned 11.61%/yr vs -18.94%/yr for FIGS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. FIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -20.29% return, which is significantly lower than FIGS's 5.28% return.
HL
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -27.35%
- YTD
- -20.29%
- 6M
- -18.68%
- 1Y
- 155.56%
- 3Y*
- 42.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
FIGS
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 129.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -18.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HL vs. FIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -20.29% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -40.57% |
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 5.28% | 83.52% | -10.94% | 3.27% | -75.58% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and FIGS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
HL:
$10.32B
FIGS:
$2.35B
HL:
$0.84
FIGS:
$0.22
HL:
18.18
FIGS:
54.44
HL:
0.08
FIGS:
0.21
HL:
6.47
FIGS:
3.32
HL:
4.02
FIGS:
5.45
HL:
$1.57B
FIGS:
$666.10M
HL:
$788.95M
FIGS:
$443.68M
HL:
$864.40M
FIGS:
$56.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. FIGS — Risk / Return Rank
HL
FIGS
HL vs. FIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.82 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 10.67 | -4.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. FIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than FIGS's maximum drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and FIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -92.77% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -34.11% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -57.56% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.90% | -92.77% | +30.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.91% | -76.13% | +24.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.93% | -75.87% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.67% | 12.19% | +12.48% |
Volatility
HL vs. FIGS - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) at 13.33%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 13.33% | +9.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.93% | 51.28% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.59% | 62.47% | +10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.35% | 70.12% | -10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.77% | 70.30% | -7.53% |
Dividends
HL vs. FIGS - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while FIGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
HL vs. FIGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and FIGS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. FIGS - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
FIGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
FIGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
FIGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and FIGS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to FIGS (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs FIGS's -92.77%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and FIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer