FIGS vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIGS or QYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between FIGS and QYLD is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FIGS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FIGS:
-0.22
QYLD:
1.81
FIGS:
0.15
QYLD:
2.48
FIGS:
1.02
QYLD:
1.42
FIGS:
-0.16
QYLD:
2.50
FIGS:
-0.79
QYLD:
13.25
FIGS:
18.15%
QYLD:
1.46%
FIGS:
66.24%
QYLD:
10.75%
FIGS:
-91.22%
QYLD:
-24.75%
FIGS:
-89.02%
QYLD:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 4.24% return.
FIGS
-11.15%
-7.41%
-1.96%
-12.28%
N/A
N/A
QYLD
4.24%
2.22%
11.86%
19.98%
7.58%
8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIGS vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FIGS
QYLD
FIGS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIGS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
FIGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.16%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 12.16% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
FIGS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -91.22%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIGS vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.31%. This indicates that FIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.