Correlation
The correlation between FIGS and QYLD is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
FIGS vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIGS or QYLD.
Performance
FIGS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FIGS:
-0.23
QYLD:
0.34
FIGS:
0.11
QYLD:
0.56
FIGS:
1.02
QYLD:
1.10
FIGS:
-0.19
QYLD:
0.30
FIGS:
-0.80
QYLD:
1.01
FIGS:
22.46%
QYLD:
5.60%
FIGS:
70.09%
QYLD:
19.16%
FIGS:
-92.77%
QYLD:
-24.75%
FIGS:
-91.32%
QYLD:
-9.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a -29.73% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.59% return.
FIGS
-29.73%
7.94%
-16.18%
-16.02%
-21.23%
N/A
N/A
QYLD
-5.59%
1.45%
-3.85%
6.38%
9.43%
7.91%
7.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIGS vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FIGS
QYLD
FIGS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FIGS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
FIGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 13.78% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
FIGS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and QYLD.
Loading data...
Volatility
FIGS vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that FIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...