FIGS vs. QYLD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).

QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.

Performance

FIGS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIGS vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIGS FIGS, Inc.	28.70%	83.52%	-10.94%	3.27%	-75.58%	-8.19%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	0.61%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	7.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a 28.70% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 0.61% return.

FIGS

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -14.60%
• YTD: 28.70%
• 6M: 115.63%
• 1Y: 224.17%
• 3Y*: 33.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 16.36%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIGS vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGS

FIGS Risk / Return Rank: 98
FIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIGS	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.77	1.00	+2.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.31	1.61	+2.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.31	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.87	1.57	+8.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.62	10.32	+17.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIGS vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGS Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGS and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIGS	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77	1.00	+2.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.56	-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between FIGS and QYLD is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FIGS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

FIGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIGS FIGS, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.85%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Drawdowns

FIGS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIGS	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.77%	-24.75%	-68.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.15%	-10.84%	-11.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.82%	-1.84%	-68.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.05%	-3.89%	-72.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.91%	1.65%	+6.26%

Volatility

FIGS vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that FIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIGS	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.77%	4.90%	+8.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.04%	7.50%	+35.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.98%	16.43%	+43.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.86%	14.84%	+55.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.86%	15.51%	+54.35%