FIGS vs. FN
FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FIGS returned -17.52%/yr vs 50.58%/yr for FN. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIGS vs. FN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 59.24% return.
FIGS
- 1D
- 4.72%
- 1M
- -14.32%
- YTD
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 159.65%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- -17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FN
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 59.24%
- 6M
- 62.08%
- 1Y
- 202.25%
- 3Y*
- 84.79%
- 5Y*
- 50.58%
- 10Y*
- 34.71%
FIGS vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 5.37% | 83.52% | -10.94% | 3.27% | -75.58% | -8.19% |
FN Fabrinet | 59.24% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 33.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGS and FN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2021 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
FIGS:
$2.35B
FN:
$26.26B
FIGS:
$0.22
FN:
$11.65
FIGS:
54.48
FN:
62.25
FIGS:
0.21
FN:
2.67
FIGS:
3.32
FN:
6.19
FIGS:
5.45
FN:
11.39
FIGS:
$666.10M
FN:
$4.24B
FIGS:
$443.68M
FN:
$509.75M
FIGS:
$56.86M
FN:
$422.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGS vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank
FIGS
FN
FIGS vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 9.90 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.63 | 24.13 | -9.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 3.12 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.96 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.61 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
FIGS vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and FN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.77% | -70.46% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.24% | -20.55% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.15% | -37.47% | -20.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.77% | -38.70% | -54.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -2.88% | -73.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.93% | -22.59% | -53.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 8.42% | +2.54% |
Volatility
FIGS vs. FN - Volatility Comparison
FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a higher volatility of 32.19% compared to Fabrinet (FN) at 24.65%. This indicates that FIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.19% | 24.65% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.26% | 54.16% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.11% | 65.29% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.16% | 53.25% | +16.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.39% | 48.08% | +22.31% |
Dividends
FIGS vs. FN - Dividend Comparison
Neither FIGS nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FIGS vs. FN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FIGS, Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIGS vs. FN - Profitability Comparison
FIGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
FIGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
FIGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGS and FN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIGS has higher volatility (32.19%) compared to FN (24.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGS dropped -92.77% vs FN's -70.46%.
FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIGS and FN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer