PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. CRON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HL vs. CRON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Cronos Group Inc. (CRON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -20.29% return, which is significantly lower than CRON's 1.90% return.


HL

1D
2.00%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
-20.29%
6M
-18.68%
1Y
154.71%
3Y*
42.93%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
13.95%

CRON

1D
-2.55%
1M
1.90%
YTD
1.90%
6M
-18.04%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
-21.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. CRON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-20.29%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%
CRON
Cronos Group Inc.
1.90%30.20%-3.35%-17.72%-35.20%-43.52%-9.52%-26.18%34.43%600.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and CRON is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016

0.16

The correlation between HL and CRON shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HL:

$0.84

CRON:

-$0.01

PS Ratio

HL:

6.47

CRON:

3.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

HL:

$1.57B

CRON:

$220.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HL:

$788.95M

CRON:

$68.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

HL:

$864.40M

CRON:

$2.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. CRON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CRON
CRON Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CRON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRON Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRON Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CRON Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRON Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. CRON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Cronos Group Inc. (CRON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLCRONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.29

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

2.27

+4.06

HL vs. CRON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the CRON Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and CRON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HL vs. CRON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than CRON's maximum drawdown of -93.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and CRON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLCRONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-93.16%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.81%

-26.91%

-28.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.81%

-46.36%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.04%

-82.06%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.91%

-88.69%

+36.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.93%

-63.61%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.67%

15.34%

+9.33%

Volatility

HL vs. CRON - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) at 9.44%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLCRONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.72%

9.44%

+13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.93%

30.10%

+24.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.59%

46.46%

+26.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.35%

53.86%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.77%

74.63%

-11.86%

Dividends

HL vs. CRON - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while CRON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRON
Cronos Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.10%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Financials

HL vs. CRON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Cronos Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
411.43M
58.97M
(HL) Total Revenue
(CRON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HL vs. CRON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hecla Mining Company and Cronos Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
61.6%
32.5%
Portfolio components
HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

CRON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.15M and revenue of 58.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

CRON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported an operating income of -1.83M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

CRON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.75M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HL and CRON have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to CRON (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs CRON's -93.16%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and CRON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer