PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRON vs. CGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRON vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRON achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGC's -8.77% return.


CRON

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.26%
YTD
3.04%
6M
7.97%
1Y
40.41%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
-20.64%
10Y*

CGC

1D
-1.89%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-8.77%
6M
-10.34%
1Y
-14.05%
3Y*
-49.86%
5Y*
-66.39%
10Y*
-25.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRON vs. CGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRON
Cronos Group Inc.
3.04%30.20%-3.35%-17.72%-35.20%-43.52%-9.52%-26.18%34.43%600.87%
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
-8.77%-58.39%-46.38%-77.88%-73.54%-64.57%16.83%-21.51%13.58%246.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CRON and CGC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016

0.66

The correlation between CRON and CGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CRON:

-$0.01

CGC:

-$1.21

PS Ratio

CRON:

3.56

CGC:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRON:

$220.07M

CGC:

$294.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRON:

$68.18M

CGC:

$71.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRON:

$2.28M

CGC:

-$225.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRON vs. CGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRON
CRON Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CRON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRON Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRON Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRON Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRON Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CGC
CGC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRON vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRONCGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

-0.25

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

-0.39

+3.08

CRON vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRON Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRON and CGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRONCGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.13

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.54

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.25

+0.69

Drawdowns

CRON vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRON drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, smaller than the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRON and CGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRONCGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.16%

-99.85%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.91%

-55.38%

+28.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.36%

-95.10%

+48.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.12%

-99.68%

+17.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.57%

-99.82%

+11.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.56%

-62.08%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.11%

35.79%

-20.68%

Volatility

CRON vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) is 11.65%, while Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that CRON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRONCGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

13.73%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.17%

66.74%

-35.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.33%

107.19%

-60.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.91%

124.27%

-70.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.73%

103.36%

-28.63%

Dividends

CRON vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRON nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRON vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cronos Group Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
58.97M
90.39M
(CRON) Total Revenue
(CGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRON vs. CGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cronos Group Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
32.5%
23.8%
Portfolio components
CRON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.15M and revenue of 58.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

CGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.47M and revenue of 90.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.

CRON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported an operating income of -1.83M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

CGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported an operating income of -26.35M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.

CRON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.75M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

CGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a net income of -62.63M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in a net margin of -69.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRON and CGC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGC has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to CRON (11.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRON dropped -93.16% vs CGC's -99.85%.

CRON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRON and CGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer