HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO).
HHL.TO and HUTL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HHL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Mar 10, 2020. HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019.
Performance
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | -7.66% | 10.47% | 3.87% | 6.74% | 1.28% | 23.97% | 5.28% | 11.89% |
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 11.42% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | -10.64% | 13.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly lower than HUTL.TO's 11.42% return.
HHL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- YTD
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- -3.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHL.TO
HUTL.TO
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHL.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 1.43 | -1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 1.96 | -2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.31 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.66 | -2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 11.46 | -11.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHL.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 1.43 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.74 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between HHL.TO and HUTL.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | 10.30% | 9.36% | 9.27% | 8.71% | 8.51% | 7.91% | 9.02% | 8.65% | 9.00% | 8.45% | 8.83% | 8.19% |
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.34% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum HUTL.TO drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and HUTL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHL.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.70% | -34.00% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -7.22% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.01% | -19.71% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.68% | -0.98% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -6.80% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 1.67% | +3.90% |
Volatility
HHL.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) at 3.63%. This indicates that HHL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HHL.TO | HUTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.63% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 6.70% | +2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 13.62% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 12.83% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 15.29% | +0.43% |