HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO).
HHL.TO and ZEB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HHL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Mar 10, 2020. ZEB.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Oct 19, 2009.
Performance
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | -5.39% | 10.47% | 3.87% | 6.74% | 1.28% | 23.97% | 5.28% | 14.05% | 2.14% | 13.62% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 3.26% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HHL.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 7.56%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.
HHL.TO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 54.03%
- 3Y*
- 26.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHL.TO
ZEB.TO
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 4.06 | -4.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 5.16 | -4.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.79 | -0.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 6.41 | -6.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 24.68 | -24.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 4.06 | -4.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.30 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.88 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.83 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between HHL.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | 10.14% | 9.36% | 9.27% | 8.71% | 8.51% | 7.91% | 9.02% | 8.65% | 9.00% | 8.45% | 8.83% | 8.19% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.91% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Drawdowns
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.70% | -39.69% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -8.44% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.01% | -25.97% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.70% | -39.69% | +12.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.49% | -4.62% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -5.70% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 2.19% | +2.98% |
Volatility
HHL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) is 4.50%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that HHL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HHL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 5.93% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 10.04% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 13.39% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 13.25% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 16.83% | -1.11% |