PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHL.TO vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
-5.39%10.47%3.87%6.74%1.28%23.97%5.28%14.05%2.14%13.62%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.96%9.25%11.28%-0.18%4.90%24.90%11.38%14.53%15.29%14.02%
Different Trading Currencies

HHL.TO is traded in CAD, while XLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HHL.TO has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 7.56%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.


HHL.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
-5.39%
6M
0.09%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
7.56%

XLV

1D
0.62%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
3.54%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HHL.TO vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HHL.TO vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHL.TO
HHL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HHL.TOXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

0.11

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

0.27

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.03

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.04

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.15

-0.07

-0.08

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHL.TO and XLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHL.TOXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.11

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.64

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.67

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.92

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between HHL.TO and XLV is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
10.14%9.36%9.27%8.71%8.51%7.91%9.02%8.65%9.00%8.45%8.83%8.19%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Drawdowns

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and XLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HHL.TOXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-39.17%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-10.76%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-17.11%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

-28.40%

+1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.49%

-7.41%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-7.12%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

5.11%

+0.06%

Volatility

HHL.TO vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) is 4.50%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that HHL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HHL.TOXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.80%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

10.99%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

17.81%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

13.81%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.76%

-0.04%