PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGRO vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGRO vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGRO achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 24.09% return.


HGRO

1D
0.86%
1M
-1.29%
6M
3.85%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.93%

DARP

1D
2.48%
1M
-1.50%
6M
11.54%
YTD
24.09%
1Y
53.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$367.14K$288.77K$436.18K
$1.36M$1.39M$1.92M

HGRO vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
7.49%13.45%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
24.09%35.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and DARP is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.84

The correlation between HGRO and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGRO vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HGRO
HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HGRO vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGRODARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.38

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

12.79

-6.19

HGRO vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGRO and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGRODARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-30.27%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-15.76%

+8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-7.17%

+3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-4.72%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

4.16%

-1.54%

Volatility

HGRO vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) is 4.10%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that HGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGRODARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

9.89%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

21.41%

-10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

26.90%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

26.84%

-13.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.69%

26.84%

-13.15%

HGRO vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGRO vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than DARP's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.35%0.43%1.93%0.32%
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGRO and DARP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to HGRO (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGRO dropped -7.61% vs DARP's -30.27%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 53.03% vs 17.25% for HGRO. On fees, HGRO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, HGRO has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 53.03% return vs 17.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGRO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.07% for HGRO.

HGRO is categorized as Quality Factor, while DARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.75% for DARP.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGRO and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer