PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFND vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFND vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


HFND

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.65%
6M
8.06%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFND vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
8.65%8.93%8.34%3.58%2.38%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HFND and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.73

The correlation between HFND and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFND vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFND
VOO

Financial Services

19.2%
11.6%

Technology

17.6%
35.7%

Industrials

13.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.8%

Utilities

5.6%
2.4%

Communication Services

5.5%
11.3%

Energy

5.5%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Financial Services

HFND
19.2%
VOO
11.6%

Technology

HFND
17.6%
VOO
35.7%

Industrials

HFND
13.5%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HFND
11.0%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

HFND
8.8%
VOO
8.5%

Basic Materials

HFND
7.6%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

HFND
5.6%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

HFND
5.5%
VOO
11.3%

Energy

HFND
5.5%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

HFND
4.3%
VOO
4.9%

Real Estate

HFND
1.4%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFND vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFND
HFND Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFND Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFND Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFND vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFNDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.16

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

14.73

-0.41

HFND vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFND Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFND and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFNDVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.39

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.89

+0.05

Drawdowns

HFND vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFNDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-33.99%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-8.90%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-18.69%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.70%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.69%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.91%

-0.59%

Volatility

HFND vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that HFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFNDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.84%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

8.90%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.42%

11.80%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.47%

16.81%

-7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.47%

18.01%

-8.54%

HFND vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFND vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
4.68%5.08%3.70%1.41%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFND and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFND has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFND dropped -13.31% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs 10.00% for HFND. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for HFND.

HFND has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

HFND is categorized as Multistrategy, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.22% for HFND and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFND and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer