PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFND vs. ARB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFND vs. ARB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than ARB's 2.12% return.


HFND

1D
-1.30%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.80%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
10Y*

ARB

1D
0.15%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.12%
6M
2.35%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFND vs. ARB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
8.16%8.93%8.34%3.58%2.28%
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
2.12%6.05%4.07%3.85%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HFND and ARB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFND vs. ARB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFND
HFND Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFND Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFND Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ARB
ARB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFND vs. ARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFNDARBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.62

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

17.70

-4.61

HFND vs. ARB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFND Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ARB Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFND and ARB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFND vs. ARB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, which is greater than ARB's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and ARB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFNDARBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-5.60%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-1.07%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-2.13%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.38%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-0.94%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.28%

+1.07%

Volatility

HFND vs. ARB - Volatility Comparison

Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) at 1.22%. This indicates that HFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFNDARBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

1.22%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

2.63%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

3.10%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

4.43%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

4.40%

+5.13%

HFND vs. ARB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ARB's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFND vs. ARB - Dividend Comparison

HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than ARB's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.42%0.43%1.12%0.00%4.18%0.00%2.87%
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
4.70%5.08%3.70%1.41%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFND and ARB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFND has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to ARB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFND dropped -13.31% vs ARB's -5.60%.

On 3-year performance, HFND leads with 9.72% vs 6.14% for ARB. On fees, ARB is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HFND has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARB is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for HFND.

HFND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.42% for ARB.

HFND is categorized as Multistrategy, while ARB is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Water Island Capital Partners LP. Their fees differ too: 1.22% for HFND and 0.87% for ARB.

HFND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFND and ARB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer