HFND vs. CTA

In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than CTA's -1.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFND and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than CTA's 4.80% yield.

The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and CTA.

The current volatility for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) is 2.00%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that HFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.