HFND vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
HFND and AOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HFND is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Oct 10, 2022. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
HFND vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFND vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFND Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF | 3.46% | 8.93% | 8.34% | 3.58% | 2.38% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.40% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | 5.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's -0.40% return.
HFND
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFND vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFND vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank
HFND
AOM
HFND vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFND | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.03 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.19 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 8.80 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFND | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.67 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFND and AOM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HFND vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than AOM's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFND Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF | 4.91% | 5.08% | 3.70% | 1.41% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.99% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
HFND vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and AOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFND | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -19.96% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -5.35% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -3.30% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -2.72% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.33% | +0.45% |
Volatility
HFND vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 3.26%. This indicates that HFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFND | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.26% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 4.89% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 8.24% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 8.09% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 7.90% | +1.60% |