PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGO vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFGO vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 48.23% return.


HFGO

1D
-0.32%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
3.70%
6M
2.09%
1Y
16.99%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-1.08%
1M
-18.82%
YTD
48.23%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGO vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
3.70%0.63%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
48.23%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGO and MEME is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.60

HFGO vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFGO
MEME

Technology

55.3%
66.7%

Communication Services

19.7%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Healthcare

7.2%
5.4%

Industrials

3.6%
22.3%

Financial Services

2.0%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Energy

0.5%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.9%

Technology

HFGO
55.3%
MEME
66.7%

Communication Services

HFGO
19.7%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HFGO
11.8%
MEME

-

Healthcare

HFGO
7.2%
MEME
5.4%

Industrials

HFGO
3.6%
MEME
22.3%

Financial Services

HFGO
2.0%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

HFGO
0.5%
MEME

-

Energy

HFGO
0.5%
MEME
4.8%

Basic Materials

HFGO

-

MEME
4.6%

Real Estate

HFGO

-

MEME

-

Utilities

HFGO

-

MEME
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFGO vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGO vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFGOMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

HFGO vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFGO vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGOMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-48.78%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.32%

-22.12%

+13.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-28.55%

+12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

Volatility

HFGO vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFGOMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

75.33%

-55.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.99%

75.33%

-49.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

75.33%

-49.34%

HFGO vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFGO vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither HFGO nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HFGO and MEME have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HFGO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HFGO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

HFGO and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFGO and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer