HFGO vs. GARP
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while GARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. HFGO is actively managed, while GARP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 23.35%/yr vs 30.65%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
HFGO vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 18.78% return.
HFGO
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 14.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.01%
GARP
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.43M | $25.59M | $23.01M | |
| $551.12K | $771.71K | $1.12M |
HFGO vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 5.49% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -6.95% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 18.78% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and GARP is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HFGO and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFGO vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFGO
GARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HFGO
GARP
Communication Services
HFGO
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
HFGO
GARP
Healthcare
HFGO
GARP
Industrials
HFGO
GARP
Financial Services
HFGO
GARP
Basic Materials
HFGO
GARP
Consumer Defensive
HFGO
GARP
-
Energy
HFGO
GARP
Real Estate
HFGO
-
GARP
Utilities
HFGO
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
GARP
HFGO vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFGO | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.49 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 9.05 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -31.34% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -13.69% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -23.73% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -2.79% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -7.27% | -8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 3.76% | +2.59% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 5.74%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 5.74% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 16.02% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 20.01% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 22.36% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 23.92% | +2.04% |
HFGO vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, HFGO and GARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HFGO has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to GARP (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, GARP leads with 30.65% vs 23.35% for HFGO. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GARP has performed better with a 30.65% return vs 23.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GARP is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer