PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGM vs. QLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
11.82%26.63%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
-1.70%24.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's -1.70% return.


HFGM

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
11.82%
6M
12.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLEIX

1D
1.32%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
6.22%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HFGM vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HFGM vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGM

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFGMQLEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

1.12

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and QLEIX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than QLEIX's 1.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
10.05%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.78%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and QLEIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGMQLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-38.11%

+27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-2.30%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-7.80%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

Volatility

HFGM vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HFGMQLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

8.70%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.02%

10.24%

+12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

10.55%

+12.47%