HFGM vs. CTA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA).

HFGM and CTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HFGM is an actively managed fund by Unlimited. It was launched on Apr 14, 2025. CTA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Mar 7, 2022.

Performance

HFGM vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HFGM vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	12.76%	26.63%
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	9.60%	0.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than CTA's 9.60% return.

HFGM

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -4.15%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTA

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 3.16%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGM vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.

HFGM

Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF

CTA

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

HFGM vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA

CTA Risk / Return Rank: 16
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGM vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFGM	CTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.64	+1.32

Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and CTA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HFGM vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than CTA's 3.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	9.96%	11.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	3.90%	3.19%	4.80%	7.78%	6.58%

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and CTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFGM	CTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-18.07%	+7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.09%	-3.92%	-3.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-5.74%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HFGM	CTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.05%	16.24%	+6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.05%	15.63%	+7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.05%	15.63%	+7.42%