PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGM vs. HFEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HFGM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.35%
6M
-6.05%
YTD
5.58%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.39%

HFEQ

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.39M$1.17M$1.73M

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and HFEQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.67

The correlation between HFGM and HFEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFGM vs. HFEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFGM
HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HFEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFGMHFEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGMHFEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

Volatility

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFGMHFEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HFEQ's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFGM vs. HFEQ - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, while HFEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
HFEQ
Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF
9.59%10.55%
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
10.64%11.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFGM and HFEQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HFGM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HFGM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.

HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 10.64%, compared with 9.59% for HFEQ.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HFGM and 1.00% for HFEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFGM and HFEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer