HEWJ vs. PAVE
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEWJ returned 22.86%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for PAVE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 22.54% return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 25.28% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 18.65% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 22.54% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and PAVE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between HEWJ and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
PAVE
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
PAVE
Technology
HEWJ
PAVE
Financial Services
HEWJ
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
PAVE
-
Communication Services
HEWJ
PAVE
-
Healthcare
HEWJ
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
HEWJ
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
PAVE
Real Estate
HEWJ
PAVE
-
Utilities
HEWJ
PAVE
Energy
HEWJ
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
PAVE
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWJ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.35 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 3.41 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.85 | 12.43 | +9.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -44.08% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -11.91% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -26.23% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -26.23% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -6.22% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 3.27% | -0.59% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 6.43% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 15.79% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 19.44% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 21.65% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 24.39% | -4.71% |
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than PAVE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.07% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and PAVE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to HEWJ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, HEWJ leads with 22.86% vs 19.69% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.75% for PAVE.
HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.47% for PAVE.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer