HEWJ vs. MLPX
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ returned 17.30%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than MLPX's 21.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 17.30%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.12% annualized return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
MLPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- 21.97%
- 6M
- 24.86%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 27.21%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 25.28% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 21.97% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and MLPX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | 0.39 |
The correlation between HEWJ and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
MLPX
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Technology
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Financial Services
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Communication Services
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Healthcare
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Basic Materials
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Real Estate
HEWJ
MLPX
-
Utilities
HEWJ
MLPX
Energy
HEWJ
MLPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
MLPX
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWJ | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.25 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 2.77 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.85 | 6.72 | +15.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -70.67% | +39.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -8.18% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -16.77% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -19.72% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | -64.70% | +33.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.92% | +6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -16.59% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 3.37% | -0.69% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.45%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 5.45% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 11.69% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 15.32% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 20.01% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 26.48% | -6.80% |
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than MLPX's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.07% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.20% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and MLPX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEWJ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to MLPX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.30% vs 12.12% for MLPX. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 4.07% for HEWJ.
HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while MLPX is MLPs. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.45% for MLPX.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer