PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEWJ vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than MLPX's 21.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 17.30%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.12% annualized return.


HEWJ

1D
2.28%
1M
9.16%
YTD
25.28%
6M
27.71%
1Y
58.27%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
22.86%
10Y*
17.30%

MLPX

1D
0.51%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
21.97%
6M
24.86%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
25.28%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
21.97%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HEWJ and MLPX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

0.39

The correlation between HEWJ and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEWJ
MLPX

Industrials

23.5%

-

Technology

23.3%

-

Financial Services

17.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Utilities

0.9%
0.3%

Energy

0.9%
99.6%

Industrials

HEWJ
23.5%
MLPX

-

Technology

HEWJ
23.3%
MLPX

-

Financial Services

HEWJ
17.4%
MLPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

HEWJ
11.1%
MLPX

-

Communication Services

HEWJ
6.7%
MLPX

-

Healthcare

HEWJ
5.7%
MLPX

-

Basic Materials

HEWJ
3.9%
MLPX

-

Consumer Defensive

HEWJ
3.2%
MLPX

-

Real Estate

HEWJ
1.8%
MLPX

-

Utilities

HEWJ
0.9%
MLPX
0.3%

Energy

HEWJ
0.9%
MLPX
99.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEWJ vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEWJMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.25

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

2.77

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.85

6.72

+15.13

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEWJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEWJ and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEWJMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-70.67%

+39.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-8.18%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-16.77%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-19.72%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.53%

-64.70%

+33.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.92%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-16.59%

+10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.37%

-0.69%

Volatility

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.45%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEWJMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

5.45%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

11.69%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

15.32%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

20.01%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

26.48%

-6.80%

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEWJ vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than MLPX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.07%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.20%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEWJ and MLPX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEWJ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to MLPX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.30% vs 12.12% for MLPX. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 4.07% for HEWJ.

HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while MLPX is MLPs. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.45% for MLPX.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEWJ and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer