PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEWJ vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than HSCZ's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 17.39%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.57% annualized return.


HEWJ

1D
0.28%
1M
3.59%
YTD
20.99%
6M
21.45%
1Y
53.81%
3Y*
28.51%
5Y*
21.47%
10Y*
17.39%

HSCZ

1D
0.30%
1M
0.23%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.74%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
20.99%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.68%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HEWJ and HSCZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.74

The correlation between HEWJ and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEWJ
HSCZ

Technology

23.5%
11.5%

Industrials

22.8%
22.8%

Financial Services

17.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
3.1%

Healthcare

5.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.9%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.4%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Energy

0.9%
4.2%

Technology

HEWJ
23.5%
HSCZ
11.5%

Industrials

HEWJ
22.8%
HSCZ
22.8%

Financial Services

HEWJ
17.9%
HSCZ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HEWJ
11.1%
HSCZ
9.9%

Communication Services

HEWJ
6.4%
HSCZ
3.1%

Healthcare

HEWJ
5.7%
HSCZ
3.7%

Basic Materials

HEWJ
3.9%
HSCZ
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

HEWJ
3.3%
HSCZ
3.1%

Real Estate

HEWJ
1.9%
HSCZ
10.4%

Utilities

HEWJ
1.0%
HSCZ
2.2%

Energy

HEWJ
0.9%
HSCZ
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEWJ vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEWJHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

2.88

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.96

12.25

+7.71

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEWJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEWJ and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum HSCZ drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEWJHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-34.89%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-9.61%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-12.81%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-20.11%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.53%

-34.89%

+3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-1.07%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-4.63%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.26%

+0.44%

Volatility

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.93%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEWJHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

3.93%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

9.71%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.95%

11.63%

+8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

13.52%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

15.47%

+4.04%

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEWJ vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than HSCZ's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.22%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.94%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEWJ and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEWJ has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to HSCZ (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.39% vs 12.57% for HSCZ. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 2.94% for HSCZ.

HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while HSCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEWJ and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer