PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSCZ vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has outperformed ISCF with an annualized return of 12.70%, while ISCF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


HSCZ

1D
0.15%
1M
1.31%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.30%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
12.70%

ISCF

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
7.82%
6M
8.05%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
11.88%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.82%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HSCZ and ISCF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.76

The correlation between HSCZ and ISCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSCZ
ISCF

Industrials

22.8%
23.8%

Financial Services

15.8%
12.1%

Technology

11.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

10.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

10.3%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
12.4%

Energy

4.2%
4.6%

Healthcare

3.7%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.7%

Utilities

2.2%
3.5%

Industrials

HSCZ
22.8%
ISCF
23.8%

Financial Services

HSCZ
15.8%
ISCF
12.1%

Technology

HSCZ
11.5%
ISCF
10.8%

Real Estate

HSCZ
10.4%
ISCF
8.5%

Basic Materials

HSCZ
10.3%
ISCF
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HSCZ
9.9%
ISCF
12.4%

Energy

HSCZ
4.2%
ISCF
4.6%

Healthcare

HSCZ
3.7%
ISCF
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

HSCZ
3.1%
ISCF
3.9%

Communication Services

HSCZ
3.1%
ISCF
3.7%

Utilities

HSCZ
2.2%
ISCF
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSCZ vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSCZISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.28

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.98

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

7.27

+6.18

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSCZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSCZ and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, smaller than the maximum ISCF drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSCZISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.89%

-40.79%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-11.34%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-13.85%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-30.70%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

-40.79%

+5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.15%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-8.12%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.09%

-0.84%

Volatility

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.66%, while iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSCZISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

4.61%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

12.43%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

14.80%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

16.72%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

17.42%

-1.86%

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSCZ vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than ISCF's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.91%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.67%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSCZ and ISCF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCF has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to HSCZ (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 12.70% vs 9.24% for ISCF. On fees, ISCF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.91% for HSCZ.

HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.40% for ISCF.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSCZ and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer