HEWJ vs. GSJY
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HEWJ tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index while GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ returned 16.48%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for GSJY. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSJY.
Performance
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed GSJY with an annualized return of 16.48%, while GSJY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 52.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 20.42% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and GSJY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between HEWJ and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
GSJY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
GSJY
Technology
HEWJ
GSJY
Financial Services
HEWJ
GSJY
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
GSJY
Communication Services
HEWJ
GSJY
Healthcare
HEWJ
GSJY
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
GSJY
Basic Materials
HEWJ
GSJY
Real Estate
HEWJ
GSJY
Utilities
HEWJ
GSJY
Energy
HEWJ
GSJY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
GSJY
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEWJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.29 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 2.12 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.91 | 7.09 | +12.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEWJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 1.54 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.49 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.55 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.54 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum GSJY drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and GSJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -32.53% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -14.08% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -14.96% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -32.53% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | -32.53% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.62% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -7.58% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.21% | -1.57% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) is 3.91%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that HEWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.21% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 15.17% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 19.48% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 18.07% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.04% | +2.61% |
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than GSJY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.24% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and GSJY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to HEWJ (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs GSJY's -32.53%.
On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 16.48% vs 9.28% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 16.48% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.
HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.25% for GSJY.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and GSJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer