HEWJ vs. EUSA
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ returned 17.30%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for EUSA. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.
Performance
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed EUSA with an annualized return of 17.30%, while EUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 25.28% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 9.38% | 10.24% | 14.64% | 17.72% | -17.13% | 25.60% | 15.03% | 30.56% | -8.58% | 19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and EUSA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HEWJ and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
EUSA
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
EUSA
Technology
HEWJ
EUSA
Financial Services
HEWJ
EUSA
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
EUSA
Communication Services
HEWJ
EUSA
Healthcare
HEWJ
EUSA
Basic Materials
HEWJ
EUSA
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
EUSA
Real Estate
HEWJ
EUSA
Utilities
HEWJ
EUSA
Energy
HEWJ
EUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
EUSA
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWJ | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.27 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 2.39 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.85 | 9.43 | +12.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and EUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -39.16% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -7.82% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -18.20% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -25.24% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | -39.16% | +7.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.23% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -4.59% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.98% | +0.70% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 3.92%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 3.92% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 9.11% | +5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 12.08% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 17.00% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 18.36% | +1.32% |
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than EUSA's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.07% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and EUSA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEWJ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to EUSA (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs EUSA's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.30% vs 11.59% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.48% for EUSA.
HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.09% for EUSA.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and EUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer