HERO vs. SIL
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.62%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for SIL. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
HERO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 4.75% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 91.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
HERO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 4.75% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and SIL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.38 |
HERO vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
SIL
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
SIL
-
Technology
HERO
SIL
-
Industrials
HERO
SIL
-
Basic Materials
HERO
-
SIL
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
SIL
Energy
HERO
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
HERO
-
SIL
-
Healthcare
HERO
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
HERO
-
SIL
-
Utilities
HERO
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
SIL
HERO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.30 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.79 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.14 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.83 | -2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.36 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.14 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -82.99% | +28.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | -32.91% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -32.91% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -55.08% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -25.87% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -51.45% | +25.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 12.82% | +1.29% |
Volatility
HERO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 5.13%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 17.66% | -12.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 41.57% | -26.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 50.01% | -30.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 39.21% | -15.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 39.60% | -15.10% |
HERO vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than SIL's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and SIL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to HERO (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 13.96% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 13.96% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.13% for SIL.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SIL is Silver. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.65% for SIL.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer