HERO vs. SIL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for SIL. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

HERO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -9.13% return.

HERO

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 4.91%
• 6M: -9.80%
• YTD: -10.56%
• 1Y: -13.47%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: -1.39%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.68%

SIL

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -5.50%
• 6M: -18.67%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 1Y: 61.23%
• 3Y*: 44.54%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 5.66%
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	$881.17K	$612.17K	$690.19K
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	$64.85M	$66.09M	$119.11M

HERO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	-10.56%	28.74%	17.65%	8.36%	-33.42%	-8.37%	91.02%	9.12%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-9.13%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and SIL is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.37

HERO vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HERO	SIL
Communication Services	92.0%	-
Technology	6.7%	-
Industrials	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	99.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HERO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HERO

HERO Risk / Return Rank: 5
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HERO	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	1.15	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	1.61	-2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.21	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.56	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	3.26	-4.03

HERO vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HERO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HERO	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-82.99%	+28.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.78%	-39.41%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-39.41%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.42%	-47.91%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.74%	-35.70%	+10.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.02%	-51.26%	+25.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.64%	18.82%	-1.18%

Volatility

HERO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 7.39%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HERO	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	12.95%	-5.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.13%	41.10%	-24.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.63%	53.55%	-32.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.48%	40.15%	-16.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.45%	39.82%	-15.37%

HERO vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HERO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than SIL's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	1.74%	1.62%	1.06%	0.73%	0.28%	0.79%	0.71%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.34%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HERO and SIL in my portfolio?

HERO and SIL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HERO or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to HERO (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, HERO or SIL?

On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 13.97% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HERO or SIL?

Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 13.97% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HERO or SIL?

HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HERO or SIL?

HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.34% for SIL.

What is the main difference between HERO and SIL?

HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SIL is Silver. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.