PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HERO vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HERO vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index while QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

HERO vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 10.03% return.

HERO

1D
1.40%
1M
4.91%
6M
-9.80%
YTD
-10.56%
1Y
-13.47%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
-1.39%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.68%

QWLD

1D
0.58%
1M
2.22%
6M
5.89%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
11.64%
ALL TIME*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

HERO

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
$881.17K$612.17K$690.19K

QWLD

SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
$247.86K$289.30K$1.06M

HERO vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF		-10.56%28.74%17.65%8.36%-33.42%-8.37%91.02%9.12%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF		10.03%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%21.57%10.24%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and QWLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.62

The correlation between HERO and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HERO vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HERO
QWLD

Communication Services

92.0%
9.5%

Technology

6.7%
24.9%

Industrials

1.4%
10.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

16.5%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Communication Services

HERO
92.0%
QWLD
9.5%

Technology

HERO
6.7%
QWLD
24.9%

Industrials

HERO
1.4%
QWLD
10.9%

Basic Materials

HERO

-

QWLD
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HERO

-

QWLD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

HERO

-

QWLD
8.1%

Energy

HERO

-

QWLD
3.4%

Financial Services

HERO

-

QWLD
16.5%

Healthcare

HERO

-

QWLD
13.2%

Real Estate

HERO

-

QWLD
1.0%

Utilities

HERO

-

QWLD
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF

SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF

Often compared with HERO:
HERO vs. ESPOHERO vs. NERDHERO vs. GAMRHERO vs. FVALHERO vs. FINXHERO vs. ESPO.LHERO vs. XOM
Often compared with QWLD:
QWLD vs. URTHQWLD vs. DGTQWLD vs. SPGMQWLD vs. VTQWLD vs. VWICXQWLD vs. JPGL.LQWLD vs. QVML

Return for Risk

HERO vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
HERO
HERO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERO vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HEROQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.66
2.06

-2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.80
2.91

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.37

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

2.60

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

11.35

-12.12

HERO vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERO vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and QWLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HEROQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.02%

-31.89%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.78%

-7.66%

-23.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-12.40%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.42%

-22.84%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.89%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.74%

0.00%

-24.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

-3.66%

-22.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.64%

1.75%

+15.89%

Volatility

HERO vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.28%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HEROQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

2.28%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

7.74%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

9.70%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

13.51%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

15.12%

+9.33%

HERO vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HERO vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than QWLD's 1.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF		1.74%1.62%1.06%0.73%0.28%0.79%0.71%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF		1.78%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

HERO and QWLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to QWLD (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.04% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.04% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.74% for HERO.

HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERO and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer