HERD vs. SPGM
HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERD returned 9.95%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for SPGM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
HERD vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 12.88% return.
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
HERD vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 12.88% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERD and SPGM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HERD and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERD vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERD
SPGM
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
Technology
HERD
SPGM
Energy
HERD
SPGM
Consumer Cyclical
HERD
SPGM
Healthcare
HERD
SPGM
Industrials
HERD
SPGM
Communication Services
HERD
SPGM
Consumer Defensive
HERD
SPGM
Basic Materials
HERD
SPGM
Utilities
HERD
SPGM
Real Estate
HERD
SPGM
Financial Services
HERD
SPGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERD vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
HERD
SPGM
HERD vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 3.35 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.73 | 15.14 | +2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
HERD vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.41% | -33.97% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.68% | -9.50% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -16.90% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.60% | -25.93% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.87% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -4.81% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.10% | -0.44% |
Volatility
HERD vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) is 2.92%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that HERD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.92% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 10.35% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 12.88% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 16.03% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 17.57% | +2.93% |
HERD vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERD vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERD and SPGM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGM has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs SPGM's -33.97%.
On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.48% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.
HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.09% for SPGM.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERD and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer