HEQT vs. MTBA
HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Simplify, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HEQT returned 14.78% vs 4.76% for MTBA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEQT charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
HEQT vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.13% return.
HEQT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 4.92% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 6.09% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.13% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQT and MTBA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HEQT and MTBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEQT vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEQT
MTBA
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HEQT
MTBA
-
Financial Services
HEQT
MTBA
Communication Services
HEQT
MTBA
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEQT
MTBA
-
Healthcare
HEQT
MTBA
-
Industrials
HEQT
MTBA
-
Consumer Defensive
HEQT
MTBA
-
Energy
HEQT
MTBA
-
Utilities
HEQT
MTBA
-
Real Estate
HEQT
MTBA
-
Basic Materials
HEQT
MTBA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQT vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
HEQT
MTBA
HEQT vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQT | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.69 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 5.74 | +7.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQT | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.56 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
HEQT vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQT | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -3.48% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.09% | -2.82% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -1.50% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -0.79% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility
HEQT vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) is 0.73%, while Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that HEQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQT | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 1.33% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 2.47% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.38% | 3.10% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 3.95% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 3.95% | +4.52% |
HEQT vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQT vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.08% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQT and MTBA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTBA has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HEQT (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.78% vs 4.76% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HEQT.
MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.
HEQT is categorized as Options Trading, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HEQT and 0.15% for MTBA.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQT and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer