HEQT vs. SFLR
HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HEQT returned 13.49%/yr vs 16.16%/yr for SFLR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEQT charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
HEQT vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 5.95% return.
HEQT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 5.01% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 16.61% | 1.43% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.95% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQT and SFLR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HEQT and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEQT vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEQT
SFLR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HEQT
SFLR
Financial Services
HEQT
SFLR
Communication Services
HEQT
SFLR
Consumer Cyclical
HEQT
SFLR
Healthcare
HEQT
SFLR
Industrials
HEQT
SFLR
Consumer Defensive
HEQT
SFLR
Energy
HEQT
SFLR
Utilities
HEQT
SFLR
Real Estate
HEQT
SFLR
Basic Materials
HEQT
SFLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQT vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
HEQT
SFLR
HEQT vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQT | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.28 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 3.08 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.44 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.05 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 12.47 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQT | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.28 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.73 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
HEQT vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQT | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -12.13% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.09% | -6.79% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.57% | -12.13% | +1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -1.75% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.66% | -0.55% |
Volatility
HEQT vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) is 0.83%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that HEQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQT | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.79% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 6.45% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.38% | 8.89% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 10.15% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 10.15% | -1.67% |
HEQT vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQT vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than SFLR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQT and SFLR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLR has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to HEQT (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs SFLR's -12.13%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.16% vs 13.49% for HEQT. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.16% return vs 13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEQT is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
HEQT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HEQT and 0.89% for SFLR.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQT and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer