HEQT vs. XCLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR).

HEQT and XCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEQT is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021. XCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

HEQT vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HEQT vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	-1.81%	10.08%	18.30%	16.61%	-8.25%	2.16%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	-4.88%	10.25%	20.67%	15.64%	-12.93%	1.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -4.88% return.

HEQT

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCLR

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: -4.88%
• 6M: -3.76%
• 1Y: 10.37%
• 3Y*: 12.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQT vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.

HEQT

Simplify Hedged Equity ETF

XCLR

Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF

Return for Risk

HEQT vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQT

HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 75
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

XCLR

XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQT vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEQT	XCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.99	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.43	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.19	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.28	+0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	5.24	+3.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEQT vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQT and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEQT	XCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.99	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.59	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between HEQT and XCLR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HEQT vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than XCLR's 13.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	1.28%	1.19%	1.29%	4.10%	3.94%	0.27%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	13.83%	13.15%	18.76%	1.40%	1.01%	1.70%

Drawdowns

HEQT vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum XCLR drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and XCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEQT	XCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-14.63%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.22%	-8.29%	+3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-6.45%	+2.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-4.82%	+1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	2.02%	-0.80%

Volatility

HEQT vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEQT	XCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	3.42%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.60%	7.16%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.45%	10.53%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.57%	10.58%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.57%	10.58%	-2.01%