HEQ vs. ZTR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HEQ (John Hancock Diversified Income Fund) and ZTR (Virtus Total Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, HEQ returned 7.66%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for ZTR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEQ charges 0.01%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for ZTR.

Performance

HEQ vs. ZTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQ achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than ZTR's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HEQ has outperformed ZTR with an annualized return of 7.66%, while ZTR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.67% annualized return.

HEQ

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 23.21%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: 7.66%

ZTR

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: 6.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQ vs. ZTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund	12.66%	15.64%	11.70%	-3.14%	-3.08%	24.44%	-14.28%	26.76%	-17.29%	23.20%
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund	8.74%	18.63%	18.31%	-3.21%	-21.32%	20.57%	-11.78%	44.65%	-24.86%	29.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQ and ZTR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011	0.44

Return for Risk

HEQ vs. ZTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQ

HEQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
HEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
HEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
HEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ZTR

ZTR Risk / Return Rank: 29
ZTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ZTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ZTR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ZTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ZTR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQ vs. ZTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEQ	ZTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.46	+0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.11	+1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.26	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	2.46	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.01	6.72	+7.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEQ vs. ZTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the ZTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQ and ZTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEQ	ZTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.46	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.18	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.31	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.31	+0.03

Drawdowns

HEQ vs. ZTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQ drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum ZTR drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQ and ZTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEQ	ZTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-57.25%	+12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-7.07%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	-25.15%	+11.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.37%	-42.64%	+17.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.38%	-57.25%	+12.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-4.98%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-9.35%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	2.58%	-0.93%

Volatility

HEQ vs. ZTR - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) at 3.42%. This indicates that HEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEQ	ZTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	3.42%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	9.29%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.50%	11.55%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	16.67%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.85%	21.61%	-2.76%

HEQ vs. ZTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTR's 3.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEQ vs. ZTR - Dividend Comparison

HEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than ZTR's 9.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund	8.45%	9.30%	9.79%	10.75%	10.09%	8.92%	11.64%	10.09%	11.50%	10.44%	9.57%	10.40%
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund	9.09%	9.52%	10.24%	15.25%	15.88%	10.96%	13.72%	11.89%	15.18%	13.85%	10.58%	9.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEQ and ZTR in my portfolio?

HEQ and ZTR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEQ or ZTR?

HEQ has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to ZTR (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQ dropped -44.38% vs ZTR's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.