PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQ vs. HFRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQ vs. HFRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQ achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than HFRO's 14.58% return.


HEQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.69%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.49%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
7.64%

HFRO

1D
-1.34%
1M
8.46%
YTD
14.58%
6M
13.05%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
-3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQ vs. HFRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
12.47%15.64%11.70%-3.14%-3.08%24.44%-14.28%26.76%-17.29%4.52%
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
14.58%25.08%-27.17%-16.97%1.71%16.33%-8.42%4.22%-12.30%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQ and HFRO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQ vs. HFRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQ
HEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HFRO
HFRO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HFRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HFRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQ vs. HFRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEQHFRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.52

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

6.11

+7.77

HEQ vs. HFRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HFRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQ and HFRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEQHFRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.93

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.13

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.07

+0.42

Drawdowns

HEQ vs. HFRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQ drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum HFRO drawdown of -52.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQ and HFRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQHFRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-52.79%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-15.74%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-43.68%

+29.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-52.79%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-23.06%

+22.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-20.68%

+12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

6.49%

-4.84%

Volatility

HEQ vs. HFRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) is 3.71%, while Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that HEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQHFRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

6.28%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

14.54%

-5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

20.63%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

23.78%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

22.50%

-3.65%

HEQ vs. HFRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than HFRO's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HEQ vs. HFRO - Dividend Comparison

HEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than HFRO's 6.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
8.46%9.30%9.79%10.75%10.09%8.92%11.64%10.09%11.50%10.44%9.57%10.40%
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
6.96%7.73%8.90%12.02%8.97%8.41%8.99%7.43%7.22%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQ and HFRO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFRO has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to HEQ (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQ dropped -44.38% vs HFRO's -52.79%.

HEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQ and HFRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer