ZTR vs. DBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL).
ZTR is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 24, 2005. DBL is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jan 27, 2012.
Performance
ZTR vs. DBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZTR vs. DBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 7.49% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 20.57% | -11.78% | 44.65% | -24.86% | 29.52% |
DBL DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund | -2.13% | 7.16% | 10.05% | 13.11% | -15.83% | 4.61% | 3.93% | 16.74% | -6.24% | 4.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTR achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than DBL's -2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTR has outperformed DBL with an annualized return of 6.42%, while DBL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.
ZTR
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
DBL
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -2.13%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZTR vs. DBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZTR has a 3.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DBL's 2.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZTR vs. DBL — Risk / Return Rank
ZTR
DBL
ZTR vs. DBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTR | DBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 0.23 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 0.40 | +1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.05 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 0.33 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 1.13 | +7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTR | DBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.23 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.21 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.16 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.32 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTR and DBL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZTR vs. DBL - Dividend Comparison
ZTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, which matches DBL's 9.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 9.06% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
DBL DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund | 9.04% | 8.66% | 8.52% | 8.60% | 8.89% | 7.17% | 8.69% | 6.83% | 10.27% | 9.03% | 8.68% | 9.35% |
Drawdowns
ZTR vs. DBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTR drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than DBL's maximum drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTR and DBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTR | DBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.25% | -26.45% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -5.72% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.64% | -24.54% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.25% | -26.45% | -30.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.07% | -3.06% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -6.90% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.68% | +0.90% |
Volatility
ZTR vs. DBL - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) at 3.80%. This indicates that ZTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZTR | DBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.80% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 5.51% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 8.04% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 11.59% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 14.62% | +6.95% |