ZTR vs. PXSGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX).
ZTR is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 24, 2005. PXSGX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006.
Performance
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 9.60% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 20.57% | -11.78% | 44.65% | -24.86% | 29.52% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.88% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTR achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTR has underperformed PXSGX with an annualized return of 6.63%, while PXSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
ZTR
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -23.38%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZTR has a 3.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZTR vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank
ZTR
PXSGX
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTR | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | -1.05 | +2.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | -1.56 | +3.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | -0.81 | +2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | -1.81 | +11.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTR | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | -1.05 | +2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | -0.24 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.44 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.40 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTR and PXSGX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison
ZTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, less than PXSGX's 53.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 8.89% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.16% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Drawdowns
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTR drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than PXSGX's maximum drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTR and PXSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTR | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.25% | -53.72% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -28.55% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.64% | -42.49% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.25% | -42.49% | -14.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -40.54% | +36.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -11.52% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 12.74% | -10.15% |
Volatility
ZTR vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) is 4.85%, while Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that ZTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZTR | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.59% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 13.19% | -4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 21.91% | -6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 24.81% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 22.52% | -0.94% |