PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQ vs. CMUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQ achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than CMUVX's 9.18% return.


HEQ

1D
0.88%
1M
0.37%
YTD
11.35%
6M
11.25%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
7.60%

CMUVX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.65%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.64%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
11.35%15.64%11.70%-3.14%-3.08%2.05%
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
9.18%14.69%13.39%19.07%-17.54%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQ and CMUVX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

0.56

The correlation between HEQ and CMUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQ vs. CMUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQ
HEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEQCMUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.76

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

11.89

-0.23

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CMUVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQ and CMUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQ drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than CMUVX's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQ and CMUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQCMUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-23.51%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-7.59%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-14.12%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.30%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-6.21%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.75%

-0.03%

Volatility

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) is 3.55%, while Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that HEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQCMUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.92%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

8.34%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

10.31%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

13.19%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

13.19%

+5.64%

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CMUVX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HEQ vs. CMUVX - Dividend Comparison

HEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, less than CMUVX's 33.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
33.10%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
8.73%9.30%9.79%10.75%10.09%8.92%11.64%10.09%11.50%10.44%9.57%10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQ and CMUVX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMUVX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to HEQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQ dropped -44.38% vs CMUVX's -23.51%.

CMUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQ and CMUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer