HEQ vs. FBCKX
HEQ (John Hancock Diversified Income Fund) and FBCKX (Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, HEQ returned 22.88% vs 45.08% for FBCKX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEQ charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FBCKX.
Performance
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQ achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than FBCKX's 18.59% return.
HEQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
FBCKX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 19.80%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund | 12.47% | 15.64% | -4.99% |
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 18.59% | 19.99% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQ and FBCKX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between HEQ and FBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQ vs. FBCKX — Risk / Return Rank
HEQ
FBCKX
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQ | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.68 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 15.61 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQ | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.67 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.25 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQ drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than FBCKX's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQ and FBCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQ | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -27.06% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -12.63% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -4.04% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.97% | -1.32% |
Volatility
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) is 3.71%, while Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that HEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQ | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.14% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 13.00% | -4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 17.43% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 23.92% | -7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 23.92% | -5.07% |
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCKX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEQ vs. FBCKX - Dividend Comparison
HEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than FBCKX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund | 8.46% | 9.30% | 9.79% | 10.75% | 10.09% | 8.92% | 11.64% | 10.09% | 11.50% | 10.44% | 9.57% | 10.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQ and FBCKX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBCKX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to HEQ (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQ dropped -44.38% vs FBCKX's -27.06%.
FBCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEQ and FBCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer