PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCKX vs. HFRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than HFRO's 14.58% return.


FBCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.11%
YTD
18.59%
6M
19.80%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HFRO

1D
-1.34%
1M
8.46%
YTD
14.58%
6M
13.05%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
-3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBCKX and HFRO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCKX vs. HFRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCKX
FBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HFRO
HFRO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HFRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HFRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBCKXHFRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.52

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

6.11

+9.51

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the HFRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCKX and HFRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBCKXHFRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.93

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

-0.07

+1.32

Drawdowns

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCKX drawdown since its inception was -27.06%, smaller than the maximum HFRO drawdown of -52.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCKX and HFRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCKXHFRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-52.79%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-15.74%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.06%

+23.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-20.68%

+16.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

6.49%

-3.52%

Volatility

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) is 4.14%, while Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that FBCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCKXHFRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

6.28%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

14.54%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

20.63%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

23.78%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

22.50%

+1.42%

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCKX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HFRO's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCKX vs. HFRO - Dividend Comparison

FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than HFRO's 6.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCKX
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z
1.60%1.90%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
6.96%7.73%8.90%12.02%8.97%8.41%8.99%7.43%7.22%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCKX and HFRO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFRO has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to FBCKX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCKX dropped -27.06% vs HFRO's -52.79%.

FBCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCKX and HFRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer