HEFA vs. ESGN
HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) and ESGN (Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index while ESGN tracks the MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEFA returned 13.44%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for ESGN. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ESGN.
Performance
HEFA vs. ESGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than ESGN's 5.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has outperformed ESGN with an annualized return of 13.44%, while ESGN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.
HEFA
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
ESGN
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
HEFA vs. ESGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 12.09% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 5.17% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and ESGN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between HEFA and ESGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEFA vs. ESGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEFA
ESGN
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEFA
ESGN
Industrials
HEFA
ESGN
Technology
HEFA
ESGN
Healthcare
HEFA
ESGN
Consumer Cyclical
HEFA
ESGN
Consumer Defensive
HEFA
ESGN
Basic Materials
HEFA
ESGN
Communication Services
HEFA
ESGN
Utilities
HEFA
ESGN
Energy
HEFA
ESGN
Real Estate
HEFA
ESGN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFA vs. ESGN — Risk / Return Rank
HEFA
ESGN
HEFA vs. ESGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFA | ESGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.46 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 8.42 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. ESGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum ESGN drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and ESGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFA | ESGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.39% | -41.71% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -9.56% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -14.38% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -24.51% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.39% | -41.71% | +9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -5.44% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -7.04% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.78% | -0.51% |
Volatility
HEFA vs. ESGN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) at 3.96%. This indicates that HEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFA | ESGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 3.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 11.06% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 13.77% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 15.33% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 16.34% | -0.63% |
HEFA vs. ESGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFA vs. ESGN - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than ESGN's 9.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 9.38% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.92% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFA and ESGN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEFA has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to ESGN (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs ESGN's -41.71%.
On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 13.44% vs 9.59% for ESGN. On fees, HEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ESGN has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.
ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 3.92% for HEFA.
HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.45% for ESGN.
HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEFA and ESGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer