HDV vs. XYLD
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.26%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for XYLD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
HDV vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 9.26%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
HDV vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and XYLD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and XYLD has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
XYLD
Energy
HDV
XYLD
Healthcare
HDV
XYLD
Financial Services
HDV
XYLD
Utilities
HDV
XYLD
Technology
HDV
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
XYLD
Industrials
HDV
XYLD
Basic Materials
HDV
XYLD
Communication Services
HDV
XYLD
Real Estate
HDV
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
XYLD
HDV vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.64 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.35 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 17.84 | -6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.71 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.69 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.58 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.60 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -33.46% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -5.29% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -15.53% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -18.66% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -33.46% | -3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -0.15% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -3.72% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.99% | +0.86% |
Volatility
HDV vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 0.88% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 5.37% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 6.55% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 11.22% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.21% | +1.52% |
HDV vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and XYLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.26% vs 8.25% for XYLD. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while XYLD is Derivative Income. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer