HDV vs. DVYA
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while DVYA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.26%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for DVYA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYA.
Performance
HDV vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 9.26%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
DVYA
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
HDV vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 13.35% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | 3.41% | -9.61% | 14.70% | -14.87% | 16.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and DVYA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and DVYA has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
DVYA
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
DVYA
Energy
HDV
DVYA
Healthcare
HDV
DVYA
Financial Services
HDV
DVYA
Utilities
HDV
DVYA
Technology
HDV
DVYA
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
DVYA
Industrials
HDV
DVYA
Basic Materials
HDV
DVYA
Communication Services
HDV
DVYA
Real Estate
HDV
-
DVYA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
DVYA
HDV vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.53 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 4.59 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 16.66 | -5.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.05 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.66 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.42 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.30 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and DVYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -45.61% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -8.64% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -19.15% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -25.37% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -45.61% | +8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -3.11% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -10.06% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.38% | -0.53% |
Volatility
HDV vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.19%, while iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.94% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 10.44% | -2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 13.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 15.08% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 17.55% | -1.82% |
HDV vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than DVYA's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.33% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and DVYA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVYA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to HDV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs DVYA's -45.61%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.26% vs 7.30% for DVYA. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while DVYA is Asia Pacific Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and DVYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer