HDMV vs. UMMA
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. HDMV is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDMV returned 12.63%/yr vs 22.73%/yr for UMMA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
HDMV vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.49% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
UMMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 35.58%
- 1Y
- 53.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.50% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 32.49% | 26.65% | 4.67% | 18.84% | -21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and UMMA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HDMV and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDMV vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
UMMA
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
UMMA
-
Industrials
HDMV
UMMA
Utilities
HDMV
UMMA
-
Real Estate
HDMV
UMMA
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
UMMA
Communication Services
HDMV
UMMA
Healthcare
HDMV
UMMA
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
UMMA
Energy
HDMV
UMMA
Basic Materials
HDMV
UMMA
Technology
HDMV
UMMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
UMMA
HDMV vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.60 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 14.07 | -10.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.68 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -34.17% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -14.93% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -18.73% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -0.77% | -5.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -9.82% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.82% | -1.02% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.83%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 7.64% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 17.26% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 20.10% | -8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 20.55% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 20.55% | -7.31% |
HDMV vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than UMMA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and UMMA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMMA has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs UMMA's -34.17%.
On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 22.73% vs 12.63% for HDMV. On fees, UMMA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMMA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer