HDMV vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. HDMV is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDMV returned 6.31%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for QCLN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

HDMV vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.

HDMV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 9.53%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 16.40%
• YTD: 52.94%
• 6M: 50.79%
• 1Y: 120.21%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: 2.16%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF	4.23%	29.31%	2.99%	9.62%	-11.47%	7.39%	-9.42%	15.00%	-7.60%	27.49%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	52.94%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and QCLN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2016	0.48

The correlation between HDMV and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDMV vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDMV	QCLN
Financial Services	24.4%	1.9%
Industrials	15.2%	30.2%
Utilities	14.6%	13.2%
Real Estate	13.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	13.0%	-
Communication Services	9.4%	-
Healthcare	3.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	9.4%
Energy	1.8%	13.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	9.4%
Technology	0.9%	20.8%

Return for Risk

HDMV vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV

HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 24
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDMV	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	3.49	-2.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	3.86	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.48	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	7.62	-6.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	26.28	-22.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDMV vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDMV	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	3.49	-2.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.06	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.20	+0.20

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDMV	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.01%	-76.18%	+44.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-15.86%	+7.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.33%	-56.08%	+45.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.11%	-69.49%	+45.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.05%	-20.99%	+14.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-43.45%	+36.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	4.59%	-1.79%

Volatility

HDMV vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.83%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDMV	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	12.56%	-8.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	26.02%	-16.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.16%	34.88%	-23.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.05%	37.97%	-25.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.24%	34.91%	-21.67%

HDMV vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDMV vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF	4.70%	5.09%	3.24%	3.14%	3.53%	3.11%	1.45%	3.63%	2.88%	3.23%	0.18%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDMV and QCLN in my portfolio?

HDMV and QCLN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDMV or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, HDMV or QCLN?

On 5-year performance, HDMV leads with 6.31% vs 2.16% for QCLN. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HDMV or QCLN?

Over the 5-year period, HDMV has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDMV or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HDMV or QCLN?

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between HDMV and QCLN?

HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.60% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.