HDMV vs. CIL
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).
HDMV and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDMV is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 24, 2016. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015.
Performance
HDMV vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDMV vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.18% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 15.00% | -7.60% | 27.49% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 16.29% | -16.00% | 11.07% | 7.21% | 19.13% | -13.34% | 27.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDMV vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
CIL
HDMV vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.29 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 3.15 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.32 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 15.10 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.29 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.44 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and CIL is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HDMV vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than CIL's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 2.38% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and CIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -36.27% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -9.66% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -29.89% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.58% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -6.66% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.73% | +0.71% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that HDMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 0.00% | +6.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 5.76% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 13.30% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 16.67% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 17.32% | -4.09% |