HDGE vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. HDGE is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -2.89%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for SENT. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

HDGE vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HDGE

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 6M: 5.59%
• 1Y: -0.65%
• 3Y*: -5.06%
• 5Y*: -2.89%
• 10Y*: -14.77%

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGE vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	5.43%	1.50%	-8.01%	-26.98%	16.59%	-7.29%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and SENT is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	-0.58

The correlation between HDGE and SENT shifts across timeframes, from -0.58 (all time) to -0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDGE vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDGE	SENT
Utilities	-	-
Basic Materials	-1.3%	3.0%
Energy	-2.5%	10.3%
Communication Services	-3.3%	1.9%
Healthcare	-3.5%	24.8%
Consumer Defensive	-4.9%	3.1%
Real Estate	-9.0%	-
Industrials	-14.1%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-18.6%	10.1%
Financial Services	-23.5%	6.1%
Technology	-26.1%	26.2%

Return for Risk

HDGE vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGE

HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 8
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGE vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDGE	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDGE	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	-0.36	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.25	-0.42

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDGE	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.88%	-30.34%	-63.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	0.00%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-15.83%	-13.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.97%	-30.34%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.08%	-27.23%	-65.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.11%	-20.90%	-49.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	0.00%	+6.16%

Volatility

HDGE vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDGE	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	0.00%	+6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	0.00%	+12.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	0.00%	+18.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.18%	12.66%	+11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.56%	13.32%	+10.24%

HDGE vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDGE vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	3.32%	3.50%	7.83%	9.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDGE and SENT in my portfolio?

HDGE and SENT have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDGE or SENT?

HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, HDGE or SENT?

On 5-year performance, HDGE leads with -2.89% vs -4.51% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HDGE or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -2.89% return vs -4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDGE or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HDGE or SENT?

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between HDGE and SENT?

HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SENT is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 1.01% for SENT.