HDGE vs. SEF
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds. HDGE is actively managed, while SEF is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDGE returned -14.77%/yr vs -11.50%/yr for SEF. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
HDGE vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HDGE has underperformed SEF with an annualized return of -14.77%, while SEF has yielded a comparatively higher -11.50% annualized return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
HDGE vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and SEF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.74 |
The correlation between HDGE and SEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDGE vs. SEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
SEF
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Utilities
HDGE
-
SEF
-
Basic Materials
HDGE
SEF
-
Energy
HDGE
SEF
-
Communication Services
HDGE
SEF
-
Healthcare
HDGE
SEF
-
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
SEF
-
Real Estate
HDGE
SEF
-
Industrials
HDGE
SEF
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
SEF
-
Financial Services
HDGE
SEF
Technology
HDGE
SEF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
SEF
HDGE vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.06 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.39 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 0.73 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.26 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.29 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | -0.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -96.51% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -9.72% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -39.40% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -41.62% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | -75.66% | -8.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.08% | -96.09% | +3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -82.72% | +12.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 5.14% | +1.02% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 3.01% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 10.85% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 14.34% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 17.96% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 20.52% | +3.04% |
HDGE vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, which matches SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and SEF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 10-year performance, SEF leads with -11.50% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SEF has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer