PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 9.09%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.38% annualized return.


HDEF

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.70%
6M
8.55%
YTD
12.33%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
8.10%

EFAV

1D
-1.09%
1M
4.40%
6M
6.21%
YTD
9.79%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
6.38%
ALL TIME*
7.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.17M$49.40M$45.31M
$3.46M$3.74M$5.68M

HDEF vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
12.33%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
9.79%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and EFAV is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.74

The correlation between HDEF and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
EFAV

Financial Services

27.2%
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

20.0%
12.6%

Healthcare

17.2%
12.2%

Energy

10.4%
7.7%

Utilities

8.1%
9.0%

Industrials

7.6%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
9.1%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.9%

Technology

0.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.6%

Financial Services

HDEF
27.2%
EFAV
19.7%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
20.0%
EFAV
12.6%

Healthcare

HDEF
17.2%
EFAV
12.2%

Energy

HDEF
10.4%
EFAV
7.7%

Utilities

HDEF
8.1%
EFAV
9.0%

Industrials

HDEF
7.6%
EFAV
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.8%
EFAV
5.1%

Communication Services

HDEF
3.7%
EFAV
9.1%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.8%
EFAV
2.9%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
EFAV
4.4%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.6%
EFAV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDEF vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDEFEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.62

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

6.10

+2.52

HDEF vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-27.56%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-6.66%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-8.65%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-27.46%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-27.56%

-8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.09%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-4.76%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.86%

-0.06%

Volatility

HDEF vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.28%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

8.85%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

10.67%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

11.88%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

13.03%

+3.10%

HDEF vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDEF and EFAV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDEF vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than EFAV's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.07%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.70%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and EFAV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDEF has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to EFAV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, HDEF leads with 9.09% vs 6.38% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF and EFAV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.07% for EFAV.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares.

HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer