PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 8.59%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.


HDEF

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.11%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
8.59%

EFAV

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.83%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
4.87%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
4.42%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and EFAV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.74

The correlation between HDEF and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
EFAV

Financial Services

26.9%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

17.9%
11.5%

Healthcare

14.0%
12.4%

Energy

13.8%
8.2%

Industrials

8.8%
15.1%

Utilities

8.4%
9.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
5.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.6%

Technology

0.6%
4.5%

Financial Services

HDEF
26.9%
EFAV
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
17.9%
EFAV
11.5%

Healthcare

HDEF
14.0%
EFAV
12.4%

Energy

HDEF
13.8%
EFAV
8.2%

Industrials

HDEF
8.8%
EFAV
15.1%

Utilities

HDEF
8.4%
EFAV
9.1%

Communication Services

HDEF
4.0%
EFAV
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.9%
EFAV
5.2%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.9%
EFAV
2.9%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.7%
EFAV
1.6%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
EFAV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDEFEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.52

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

4.22

+2.14

HDEF vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDEFEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.95

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.54

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.54

-0.08

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-27.56%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-6.46%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-8.75%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-27.46%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-27.56%

-8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-5.07%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.77%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.32%

+0.29%

Volatility

HDEF vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.14%. This indicates that HDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.14%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

8.19%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

10.32%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

11.79%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

13.21%

+3.03%

HDEF vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDEF and EFAV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDEF vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than EFAV's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.06%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.62%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HDEF and EFAV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HDEF has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, HDEF leads with 8.59% vs 5.92% for EFAV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF and EFAV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 3.06% for EFAV.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares.

HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer