PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.96% return.


HDEF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
3.99%
6M
6.18%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
8.59%

EFAS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
12.96%
6M
17.29%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.99%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
12.96%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and EFAS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.74

The correlation between HDEF and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDEF vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
EFAS

Financial Services

26.9%
30.1%

Consumer Defensive

17.9%
8.1%

Healthcare

14.0%
0.1%

Energy

13.8%
13.7%

Industrials

8.8%
9.9%

Utilities

8.4%
14.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
11.3%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.8%

Technology

0.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

HDEF
26.9%
EFAS
30.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
17.9%
EFAS
8.1%

Healthcare

HDEF
14.0%
EFAS
0.1%

Energy

HDEF
13.8%
EFAS
13.7%

Industrials

HDEF
8.8%
EFAS
9.9%

Utilities

HDEF
8.4%
EFAS
14.4%

Communication Services

HDEF
4.0%
EFAS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.9%
EFAS
1.9%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.9%
EFAS
11.3%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.7%
EFAS
1.8%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
EFAS
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDEFEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

5.44

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

14.48

-8.33

HDEF vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDEFEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.73

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.56

-0.11

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-44.38%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-5.30%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-11.84%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-28.81%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-3.01%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-7.08%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.99%

+0.60%

Volatility

HDEF vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that HDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.96%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

8.20%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

10.60%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

15.59%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

18.33%

-2.09%

HDEF vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDEF vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.65%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and EFAS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDEF has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.04% vs 9.83% for HDEF. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 3.65% for HDEF.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer