HCOW vs. VLUE
HCOW (Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF) and VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. HCOW is actively managed, while VLUE is passively managed. Over the past year, HCOW returned 21.68% vs 91.45% for VLUE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HCOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
HCOW vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.00% return.
HCOW
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VLUE
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 20.77%
- YTD
- 49.00%
- 6M
- 51.40%
- 1Y
- 91.45%
- 3Y*
- 34.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
HCOW vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF | 4.48% | 5.76% | 7.63% | 6.44% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 49.00% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCOW and VLUE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between HCOW and VLUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
HCOW vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCOW
VLUE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
HCOW
VLUE
Industrials
HCOW
VLUE
Financial Services
HCOW
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
HCOW
VLUE
Energy
HCOW
VLUE
Healthcare
HCOW
VLUE
Basic Materials
HCOW
VLUE
Communication Services
HCOW
VLUE
Utilities
HCOW
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
HCOW
VLUE
Real Estate
HCOW
-
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCOW vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
HCOW
VLUE
HCOW vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCOW | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.91 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 10.17 | -6.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 45.62 | -34.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCOW | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 5.32 | -3.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.76 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HCOW vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCOW | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -39.47% | +15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -9.04% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.42% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -6.01% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.01% | -0.06% |
Volatility
HCOW vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) is 3.63%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that HCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCOW | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 8.03% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 13.96% | -5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 17.30% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 17.78% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 19.82% | -2.22% |
HCOW vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCOW vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than VLUE's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF | 11.73% | 10.88% | 8.13% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.40% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCOW and VLUE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to HCOW (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCOW dropped -24.15% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 1-year performance, VLUE leads with 91.45% vs 21.68% for HCOW. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HCOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 91.45% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HCOW.
HCOW has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCOW and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCOW and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer