PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCOW vs. CDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCOW vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HCOW vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
-1.90%5.76%7.63%6.44%
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
9.03%8.96%14.48%2.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 9.03% return.


HCOW

1D
1.72%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
1.78%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CDC

1D
0.77%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
9.03%
6M
8.89%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCOW vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HCOW vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCOW vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCOWCDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

0.93

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.33

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.23

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.09

4.90

-2.80

HCOW vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and CDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCOWCDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

0.93

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.74

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and CDC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HCOW vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.93%, more than CDC's 3.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
11.93%10.88%8.13%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.19%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and CDC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HCOWCDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-21.37%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.36%

-11.27%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-3.07%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-5.14%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.84%

+1.50%

Volatility

HCOW vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.97%. This indicates that HCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HCOWCDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.97%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

7.03%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.94%

13.63%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

12.56%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

13.22%

+4.71%