HCMT vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCMT returned 14.07%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for TDVG. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

HCMT vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.

HCMT

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -2.68%
• 6M: -0.37%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.57%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	$1.31M	$1.90M	$1.82M
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

HCMT vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	1.23%	7.39%	39.14%	6.45%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMT and TDVG is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.67

The correlation between HCMT and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

HCMT vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HCMT	TDVG
Technology	14.9%	27.4%
Financial Services	4.8%	19.3%
Communication Services	3.6%	0.8%
Healthcare	3.6%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	6.7%
Industrials	3.1%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	6.6%
Energy	1.3%	4.5%
Utilities	1.1%	3.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.5%
Basic Materials	0.7%	2.8%

Return for Risk

HCMT vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCMT

HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 26
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCMT vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCMT	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.87	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	2.69	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	2.51	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	10.48	-8.19

HCMT vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMT and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCMT vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCMT	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-19.20%	-17.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.58%	-7.24%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.26%	-14.02%	-22.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.75%	-0.92%	-8.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-3.67%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.71%	1.73%	+4.98%

Volatility

HCMT vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCMT	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.49%	2.20%	+8.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.76%	7.30%	+14.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.43%	9.74%	+18.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.28%	13.87%	+15.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.28%	13.81%	+15.47%

HCMT vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCMT vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	0.61%	0.43%	2.75%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCMT and TDVG in my portfolio?

HCMT and TDVG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCMT or TDVG?

HCMT has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, HCMT or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, TDVG leads with 14.55% vs 14.07% for HCMT. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCMT or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 14.55% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCMT or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCMT or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.61% for HCMT.

What is the main difference between HCMT and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.